The Ivalice Chronicles isn’t just a remaster label slapped onto a sacred PS1-era tactics RPG. It’s Square Enix formally acknowledging that Final Fantasy Tactics has two equally valid identities: the brutal, opaque classic that defined a genre, and a modernized interpretation that smooths its sharpest edges without rewriting its soul. Understanding which one you’re getting is critical, because the experience can feel dramatically different depending on where you land.
At its core, both versions tell the same politically charged tragedy of Ramza Beoulve, class warfare, Zodiac conspiracies, and a war where the real villains wear crowns, not monster sprites. The divergence comes down to how much friction you want between you and the systems. The Classic version preserves that friction. The Enhanced version strategically removes it.
Classic Version: The Original Ivalice, Warts and All
The Classic version is Final Fantasy Tactics exactly as it existed in its original form, with all the quirks that longtime fans either love or lovingly tolerate. Job abilities are learned blindly, RNG can swing fights brutally, and the game offers almost no safety nets if you soft-lock yourself with a bad save before a spike boss like Wiegraf. This is the version where preparation matters more than reflexes, and knowledge is your strongest stat.
Mechanically, nothing is streamlined. JP grinding is slower, skill descriptions can be vague, and positioning mistakes are punished hard because there’s no undo button or mid-battle safety valve. The difficulty curve is uneven by modern standards, but that unpredictability is part of the identity. Victory feels earned because failure is very real.
Audiovisually and in presentation, the Classic version maintains its original pacing, UI logic, and combat speed. Animations linger, menus feel deliberate, and the game assumes you’re willing to meet it on its terms. For purists, this is Ivalice in its raw, uncompromised form.
Enhanced Version: Modern Comfort Without Mechanical Betrayal
The Enhanced version is built for players who love deep systems but don’t want to fight the interface or lose progress to outdated design philosophy. Quality-of-life updates are the headline feature here, including clearer ability descriptions, improved UI readability, faster combat flow, and smarter menu navigation. These changes don’t make the game easier so much as they make it fairer.
Gameplay balance is subtly adjusted to reduce extreme difficulty spikes and soft-lock scenarios. You still need to manage aggro, optimize turn order, and respect enemy DPS, but the game is more transparent about how and why things happen. Enhanced versions often include conveniences like battle speed controls, save flexibility, and improved onboarding for complex job interactions.
The presentation also sees meaningful upgrades. Visual clarity is improved without losing the iconic sprite aesthetic, audio is cleaned up, and localization is typically refined to better convey the political nuance and emotional subtext of the script. The result is a version that feels contemporary while still respecting the original’s tone and intent.
Two Philosophies, One Legendary Tactics RPG
What The Ivalice Chronicles ultimately offers is choice. The Classic version preserves the historical artifact, demanding patience, system mastery, and tolerance for old-school design. The Enhanced version respects your time, clarifies its mechanics, and smooths the path without trivializing the strategy.
Neither version replaces the other, and that’s the point. One challenges you to survive Ivalice as it once was. The other invites you to understand it more clearly than ever before.
Core Gameplay & Mechanical Differences: Jobs, Balance Tweaks, and System Adjustments
Once you move past presentation and pacing, the real divide between Classic and Enhanced reveals itself in how each version handles Final Fantasy Tactics’ famously dense systems. Both editions share the same job tree, turn-based flow, and CT-driven initiative, but the feel of progression and balance shifts in meaningful ways. This is where veterans will notice friction, and newcomers will feel either empowered or overwhelmed.
Job System Fidelity vs Modern Rebalancing
The Classic version preserves the original job ecosystem almost verbatim, including its notorious power spikes and dead-end roles. Jobs like Calculator, Ninja, and Summoner can completely dominate encounters once unlocked, while others exist mainly as stepping stones for JP farming. This imbalance is part of the original meta, rewarding system mastery but also encouraging broken builds.
The Enhanced version reins this in without flattening the sandbox. Overperforming jobs see subtle tuning to damage formulas, JP costs, or skill availability, while underused roles gain small but impactful utility buffs. The result is a broader viable roster, where team composition matters more than exploiting one runaway job.
JP Economy, Skill Progression, and Grinding Pressure
In Classic, JP gain is slow, opaque, and heavily dependent on repetitive actions. Efficient grinding often means stalling fights, self-targeting buffs, or deliberately dragging out encounters to farm abilities. For some players, this is the intended rhythm; for others, it’s pure friction.
Enhanced adjusts the JP economy to better respect player time. JP gain is more clearly communicated, spillover systems are easier to understand, and progression curves are smoothed to reduce mandatory grinding. You still need to plan builds carefully, but you’re less likely to hit a wall where the only solution is hours of menu optimization.
Battle Balance, RNG Transparency, and Difficulty Spikes
Classic FFT is infamous for its sudden difficulty cliffs, often driven by hidden mechanics or misleading hit rates. Accuracy, evasion, and reaction abilities operate largely behind the curtain, turning some encounters into RNG traps if you don’t already know the math. Boss fights like Riovanes remain legendary for all the wrong reasons.
The Enhanced version doesn’t remove difficulty, but it reframes it. Hit chances, status effects, and turn order are more clearly displayed, reducing guesswork and feel-bad losses. Enemy AI remains aggressive and smart, but the game is more honest about why you failed, which dramatically improves learning and adaptation.
System Adjustments That Change How Battles Feel
Classic combat is deliberate and sometimes glacial, with long animations and rigid turn flow. Every spell cast and sword swing reinforces the weight of each decision, but it also magnifies mistakes and slows experimentation. Resetting after a bad turn can feel punishing.
Enhanced streamlines this experience through faster animations, optional speed controls, and smoother input handling. These tweaks don’t alter the underlying rules, but they change how willing players are to test strategies mid-fight. The end result is more experimentation, less save-scumming, and a stronger sense of tactical momentum.
Status Effects, Equipment, and Build Clarity
In the Classic version, equipment effects and status interactions often require external knowledge to fully grasp. Tooltips are minimal, synergies are hidden, and some mechanics only reveal themselves through failure. For veterans, this mystery is part of the charm.
Enhanced brings clarity without over-explaining. Equipment bonuses, resistances, and passive effects are communicated more cleanly, making build planning less arcane. This shifts the challenge away from deciphering systems and toward executing strategies on the battlefield.
What These Changes Mean for Different Players
For purists, Classic offers an uncompromised test of tactical endurance and system literacy. It rewards those who memorize formulas, exploit turn order, and accept imbalance as part of the experience. Every victory feels earned because the game gives you nothing for free.
Enhanced, by contrast, is about informed decision-making. It respects the player’s intelligence while removing unnecessary opacity, allowing strategy to shine without fighting the interface or the math. The core soul of Final Fantasy Tactics remains intact, but the path through Ivalice becomes clearer, fairer, and more inviting.
Quality-of-Life Evolution: Interface, Speed Options, Save Systems, and Modern Conveniences
If the previous changes redefine how battles feel, quality-of-life updates determine how often players are willing to engage with those battles in the first place. This is where the gap between Classic and Enhanced becomes impossible to ignore. The core tactics remain unchanged, but the friction surrounding them is radically different.
Interface Readability and Information Density
Classic Final Fantasy Tactics reflects its PlayStation-era roots, with dense menus, limited tooltips, and critical information buried behind multiple button presses. Turn order, charge times, and conditional effects often require mental tracking rather than on-screen confirmation. Veterans internalize this over time, but new players can feel overwhelmed before the first real difficulty spike.
Enhanced modernizes the interface without dumbing it down. Turn order is clearer, ability ranges are easier to parse, and contextual information is surfaced when it matters most. You spend less time menu-diving and more time making decisions, which keeps the tactical loop tight and engaging.
Battle Speed and Animation Control
One of the Classic version’s defining traits is its deliberate pacing. Spell incantations linger, summons dominate the screen, and repeated encounters can stretch far longer than intended. That pacing reinforces weight, but it also makes grinding JP or retrying fights feel exhausting.
Enhanced introduces speed options that fundamentally change play habits. Faster animations and adjustable battle flow let players experiment freely without sacrificing hours to repetition. It doesn’t trivialize combat, but it respects the player’s time in a way the original never attempted.
Save Systems and Retry Flexibility
Classic saving is unforgiving by modern standards. Hard saves, limited checkpoints, and the infamous multi-battle sequences can trap unprepared players in unwinnable states. It’s a design that demands foresight and punishes complacency.
Enhanced softens that edge with improved save handling and smarter retry options. While it doesn’t eliminate risk, it dramatically reduces frustration tied to progress loss. Players are encouraged to learn from mistakes instead of reloading out of fear.
Modern Conveniences That Change Player Behavior
Small touches make a massive difference. Faster menu navigation, cleaner job and ability screens, and clearer feedback on hit rates and status effects all compound into a smoother experience. These aren’t flashy features, but they quietly reshape how players approach builds and encounters.
In Classic, players often play cautiously because the game is opaque and slow to recover from errors. Enhanced invites bold strategies, experimental party compositions, and mid-campaign pivots. The result is the same legendary tactical depth, delivered with far less resistance between the player and Ivalice’s most punishing decisions.
Visual & Audio Presentation: Sprites, Effects, Cutscenes, and Soundtrack Variations
All those modern conveniences feed directly into how the game looks and sounds in motion. Visual clarity and audio feedback aren’t just cosmetic in a tactics RPG; they shape how quickly players read the battlefield, anticipate outcomes, and stay emotionally locked into long campaign arcs. This is where the Classic and Enhanced editions diverge in philosophy more than any other area.
Sprite Work and Battlefield Readability
Classic Final Fantasy Tactics leans on its original sprite work with minimal alteration. The hand-drawn pixel art still carries immense character, from job silhouettes to subtle idle animations that telegraph unit roles at a glance. On original hardware or unfiltered emulation, however, those sprites can blur together during crowded encounters, especially on larger maps with vertical complexity.
Enhanced preserves the original sprite designs but sharpens their presentation. Cleaner scaling, refined outlines, and improved contrast make facing, elevation, and status effects easier to parse mid-fight. The result isn’t a remake aesthetic, but a restoration that prioritizes tactical readability without sacrificing the iconic FFT look.
Spell Effects, Summons, and Combat Feedback
In the Classic version, spell effects are lavish and unapologetically slow. Summons fill the screen, Holy detonates with theatrical flair, and status effects linger visually long after the numbers resolve. It’s impressive, but repeated exposure during grinding or retries can make combat feel sluggish.
Enhanced tightens visual feedback without neutering spectacle. Effects resolve faster, hit confirmations are clearer, and overlapping animations are less likely to obscure unit positions. Players get the same dramatic payoff, just tuned for repeated tactical iteration rather than occasional awe.
Cutscenes and Story Presentation
Classic storytelling relies heavily on in-engine dialogue portraits and limited animated sequences. The tone is grounded and somber, but the delivery can feel stiff, especially during politically dense exchanges where subtle expressions matter. It asks players to meet the game halfway through imagination.
Enhanced expands presentation through higher-quality cutscene playback and refined transitions between gameplay and story beats. Dialogue scenes flow more naturally, and key moments land with greater emotional clarity. It doesn’t rewrite FFT’s famously restrained narrative style, but it elevates how that story is conveyed.
Soundtrack Options and Audio Direction
The original soundtrack remains one of FFT’s greatest strengths. Its sparse instrumentation and somber melodies reinforce Ivalice’s themes of decay, ambition, and moral ambiguity. In Classic, that audio profile is untouched, complete with the limitations and charm of its era.
Enhanced offers greater flexibility in how players experience that music. Cleaner audio mixing, optional rearrangements, and improved sound effect balance modernize the soundscape without drowning out the original compositions. Whether players prefer the raw, nostalgic mix or a more polished presentation, Enhanced gives control back to the listener rather than enforcing a single vision.
Localization & Narrative Experience: Script Revisions, Voice Acting, and Lore Fidelity
Where the audiovisual upgrades modernize how Final Fantasy Tactics feels, localization determines how its story actually lands. FFT is dense, politically charged, and allergic to simple heroes, so even small script changes can reshape character motivation and thematic weight. The divide between Classic and Enhanced here isn’t cosmetic; it directly affects how players interpret Ivalice’s history and power structures.
Script Translation: Literal vs Literary
Classic uses the original PlayStation-era localization, a product of its time. The translation is straightforward and functional, but often flattens nuance, especially in scenes heavy on church doctrine, noble lineage, or historical revisionism. Names, titles, and political relationships are present, but rarely explained with precision.
Enhanced adopts the revised script first introduced in later releases, leaning hard into archaic phrasing and formal structure. Characters speak with deliberate cadence, reinforcing class divisions and institutional authority. For some players, it’s richer and more immersive; for others, it can feel verbose, especially during long tactical intermissions where story beats stack back-to-back.
Clarity vs Flavor in Narrative Delivery
Classic’s simpler language has an advantage during gameplay-heavy sessions. Dialogue is easier to parse quickly, which matters when bouncing between battles, job management, and story scenes. You’re less likely to pause mid-cutscene to mentally untangle phrasing or re-read political jargon.
Enhanced prioritizes flavor over speed. Conversations carry more weight, but they demand attention, particularly for first-time players unfamiliar with Ivalice’s factions. The result is a narrative that feels more like a historical chronicle than a war diary, rewarding focused play but punishing distraction.
Voice Acting and Its Impact
Classic is entirely text-driven, relying on portraits and player imagination to sell emotion. For veterans, this reinforces FFT’s stage-play presentation, where tone is inferred rather than dictated. The absence of voice acting keeps pacing tight and leaves interpretation open.
Enhanced introduces full voice acting for story sequences, fundamentally altering the experience. Performances add emotional texture to key figures like Ramza, Delita, and the antagonists driving Ivalice’s corruption. However, it also locks in characterization; once a line is voiced, ambiguity narrows, and players lose some interpretive freedom.
Lore Consistency and Worldbuilding
Enhanced is more internally consistent with broader Ivalice canon. Terminology aligns better with later titles, religious concepts are clearer, and historical references are less muddled. This makes it ideal for players invested in FFT as part of a larger mythos rather than a standalone tragedy.
Classic, by contrast, feels more self-contained. Its looser localization occasionally obscures intent, but it also avoids retroactive continuity. For purists, that rawness preserves the original narrative texture, even when it sacrifices clarity.
Choosing the Narrative Experience That Fits Your Playstyle
Players who value speed, readability, and personal interpretation will find Classic’s localization easier to live with during long sessions. It complements a gameplay-first mindset where story enhances tactics without interrupting flow.
Enhanced caters to players who want FFT’s narrative fully realized, even if that means slowing down. It treats the script as sacred text, voice acting as performance, and lore as something to be studied. Neither approach is wrong, but they deliver very different emotional rhythms, and that choice shapes the entire journey through Ivalice.
Difficulty, Challenge Curve, and AI Behavior: How Each Version Tests the Player
Where narrative presentation changes how FFT feels, difficulty changes how it fights back. Both versions demand planning, positioning, and respect for RNG, but they challenge the player in very different ways. The contrast isn’t about which is harder in a vacuum, but how each version teaches, punishes, and rewards tactical decision-making over time.
Classic’s Front-Loaded Brutality and Knowledge Checks
Classic Final Fantasy Tactics is infamous for its uneven but ruthless challenge curve. Early chapters can feel deceptively manageable, then suddenly spike with battles like Dorter Trade City or Wiegraf that punish unprepared builds and poor job planning. The game assumes experimentation, failure, and reloads as part of the learning process.
Enemy formations in Classic often mirror player access to jobs and abilities, creating brutal mirror matches where positioning and turn order matter more than raw stats. The AI is conservative but opportunistic, exploiting exposed units and punishing overextension. Mistakes compound quickly, especially when limited save points lock players into difficult encounters.
Enhanced’s Smoothed Curve and Player-Friendly Adjustments
Enhanced deliberately sandpapers the sharpest edges of FFT’s difficulty. Early-game encounters are rebalanced to better introduce mechanics, giving players more room to understand systems like Charge Time, Zodiac compatibility, and status stacking before being punished for misuse. This makes the opening chapters feel more readable without trivializing them.
Quality-of-life improvements reduce frustration without removing stakes. Faster animations and clearer UI feedback help players better track turn order, buffs, and debuffs, which directly affects decision-making accuracy. You’re still punished for poor positioning, but fewer losses feel like the game withholding information.
AI Behavior: Predictable Threats vs Tactical Pressure
Classic AI operates on straightforward priorities: focus low HP units, exploit elemental weaknesses, and capitalize on status effects when available. It’s predictable once understood, but deadly when underestimated. Because player tools are more limited early on, even basic enemy behavior can feel oppressive.
Enhanced subtly upgrades AI pressure through encounter design rather than raw intelligence. Enemies are more deliberately composed, with synergistic job setups that encourage players to think in terms of threat assessment and aggro control. Instead of cheap surprises, Enhanced leans into sustained tactical stress, forcing players to adapt across longer engagements.
Permadeath, Save Structure, and Psychological Difficulty
Both versions retain FFT’s permanent death system, but how it feels differs dramatically. In Classic, limited save opportunities and slower pacing amplify tension, making every KO feel like a potential disaster. The fear of losing a trained unit often pushes players into overly cautious play.
Enhanced softens that psychological pressure without removing consequences. More generous save structures and faster recovery between attempts encourage experimentation with riskier strategies. The result is a version that challenges execution and planning rather than patience and tolerance for repetition.
Which Version Pushes You Harder Depends on How You Learn
Classic tests player endurance, system mastery through failure, and willingness to internalize opaque mechanics. It’s a game that expects you to learn by bleeding, and for many veterans, that’s part of its identity. Every victory feels earned because it probably came after multiple reloads.
Enhanced tests adaptability, long-term planning, and tactical consistency. It challenges players to engage deeply with FFT’s systems without burying them under friction. The difficulty is still real, but it’s framed as a strategic conversation rather than a trial by fire, and that distinction defines how each version pushes the player across the long war for Ivalice.
Platform Considerations & Performance: Where and How Each Version Plays Best
All that talk about difficulty and friction ultimately funnels into a practical question: where you play FFT fundamentally changes how it feels. Platform choice isn’t just about convenience here; it directly affects pacing, readability, input comfort, and even how punishing the game’s systems feel over a long campaign. Classic and Enhanced may share the same tactical DNA, but they live very different lives depending on the hardware beneath them.
Classic Version Platforms: Authentic, Fragile, and Often Inflexible
The Classic experience is most closely tied to its original PlayStation roots and early ports, whether via original hardware, emulation, or legacy console releases. On real PS1 hardware, performance is stable but rigid, with long load times, sluggish menu navigation, and occasional frame pacing hiccups during spell effects. None of this breaks the game, but it absolutely slows the tactical rhythm.
Emulation introduces flexibility, but also inconsistency. Save states, speed toggles, and resolution scaling can dramatically reduce Classic’s friction, yet they also risk undermining its intended tension. For purists, that tradeoff matters, because FFT’s difficulty was built around those pauses, delays, and moments of forced commitment.
Enhanced Platforms: Modern Hardware, Modern Expectations
Enhanced is clearly designed with modern platforms in mind, including current consoles and PC. Load times are effectively nonexistent, menu navigation is snappy, and large-scale spell animations no longer tank performance. This has a real gameplay impact, keeping players mentally engaged in long battles instead of waiting on the engine to catch up.
PC in particular is the standout option. Mouse support improves menu precision, higher resolutions clean up sprite readability, and stable frame pacing makes dense encounters easier to parse. Enhanced doesn’t just run better; it communicates information more cleanly, which directly feeds into smarter tactical decision-making.
Handheld and Portable Play: Where Enhanced Pulls Ahead
Portable play exposes the biggest gap between versions. Classic on handheld emulation often struggles with small text, cluttered menus, and zoom limitations that make height, facing, and hit percentages harder to read. Long battles also clash with limited suspend options, increasing the risk of lost progress.
Enhanced is built to accommodate modern handheld habits. Clearer UI scaling, improved font legibility, and more forgiving save structures make it far better suited for short sessions. Being able to pause, suspend, and resume without mental recalibration turns FFT from a commitment-heavy experience into a more flexible tactical companion.
Performance as Difficulty Modifier
Performance isn’t just technical; it’s psychological. Slower interfaces and longer load times in Classic subtly increase fatigue, which can lead to mistakes and risk-averse play. When every action takes longer to execute, players are more likely to turtle, rely on safe strategies, and avoid experimentation.
Enhanced removes that drag almost entirely. Faster feedback loops encourage testing abilities, repositioning aggressively, and adapting mid-fight when RNG swings the wrong way. In practice, smoother performance lowers frustration without lowering the skill ceiling, making losses feel instructional instead of exhausting.
Choosing the Right Platform for Your Playstyle
If your goal is historical authenticity and you value experiencing FFT as it originally challenged players, Classic on original or faithfully emulated hardware still delivers that raw edge. The friction is real, and so is the sense of surviving a hostile system. It’s a choice rooted in nostalgia and respect for the game’s original pacing.
If you want FFT to meet modern expectations without losing its tactical depth, Enhanced on current consoles or PC is the clear winner. It respects player time, sharpens mechanical clarity, and lets the strategy take center stage. The war for Ivalice is the same, but how smoothly you fight it depends entirely on where you choose to deploy.
Who Should Play Which Version? Recommendations by Playstyle, Nostalgia, and First-Time Experience
By this point, the divide between Classic and Enhanced should feel less like a simple remaster debate and more like a question of intent. Both versions deliver the same political tragedy, the same brutal job system, and the same merciless RNG. What changes is how much friction you want between you and the tactics themselves.
This is where personal priorities matter more than patch notes. Your tolerance for old-school rough edges, your relationship with Ivalice, and how you plan to engage with FFT’s systems should guide the decision.
For First-Time Players: Enhanced Is the Definitive Onboarding
If you’ve never played Final Fantasy Tactics, Enhanced is the clear recommendation. The refined UI, clearer tooltips, and improved readability make learning height, CT, Zodiac compatibility, and ability interactions far less punishing. You still have to think, but the game stops fighting you at the interface level.
Quality-of-life features also soften FFT’s most infamous early-game spikes. Faster menus, more reliable save options, and better feedback reduce the odds of losing an hour to a single misread hit percentage or an unlucky crit. The difficulty remains intact, but it feels fair instead of archaic.
Enhanced also shines for players coming from modern strategy RPGs. If you’re used to Fire Emblem, Triangle Strategy, or Tactics Ogre Reborn, Enhanced speaks your language. It preserves FFT’s depth while aligning with contemporary expectations of clarity and respect for player time.
For Veterans and Purists: Classic Preserves the Original Tension
Classic is best suited for players who already understand FFT’s systems and want to engage with them on their original terms. The slower pace, limited feedback, and rougher presentation amplify the game’s oppressive tone. Every decision feels heavier because reversing it is harder.
For longtime fans, Classic also preserves mechanical quirks that subtly change how the game is played. Job grinding feels more deliberate, positioning errors are more punishing, and experimentation carries real risk. The friction reinforces the sense that Ivalice is hostile, uncaring, and deeply unfair by design.
This version is especially appealing if nostalgia is part of the appeal. The original sound mix, timing, and visual density recreate the experience many players internalized decades ago. It’s not comfortable, but that discomfort is the point.
For Narrative-First Players: Enhanced’s Localization and Presentation Win
If story is your primary motivation, Enhanced offers the stronger overall package. Updated localization improves readability without stripping the script of its political weight. Character motivations, class tensions, and ideological conflicts land more cleanly thanks to sharper text presentation and pacing.
Enhanced’s audio balance and visual polish also elevate key story moments. Dialogue-heavy scenes are easier to follow, and battles tied to major narrative beats feel less mechanically cluttered. The tragedy of Ramza and Delita benefits from smoother delivery.
Classic still tells the same story, but it asks more patience from the player. Text density, font size, and older localization choices can obscure nuance, especially for newcomers. For lore-focused players, Enhanced removes barriers without diluting meaning.
For Challenge Seekers and System Exploiters: It Depends on Your Flavor of Difficulty
Players who love pushing FFT to its limits will find value in both versions, but in different ways. Classic emphasizes endurance and risk management. Longer battles, slower execution, and fewer safety nets mean mistakes compound more harshly.
Enhanced, by contrast, encourages aggressive optimization. Faster feedback loops make it easier to test builds, abuse turn order, and adapt when RNG turns against you. The challenge shifts from surviving the interface to mastering the system.
Neither version is easier in a vacuum. Classic tests patience and discipline, while Enhanced tests creativity and execution. Your preference comes down to whether you enjoy wrestling the game or outsmarting it.
The Final Recommendation
If you want the purest expression of FFT’s design philosophy as it was originally delivered, Classic remains a powerful, if demanding, experience. It’s a time capsule that rewards commitment and punishes complacency. Choose it if you value authenticity over comfort.
For everyone else, Enhanced is the version that best represents Final Fantasy Tactics today. It honors the original while making it accessible, readable, and sustainable for modern play habits. No matter where you start, Ivalice remains unforgiving, brilliant, and endlessly replayable—just make sure you pick the battlefield that suits how you fight.