“Banned” can mean a court ordered copies confiscated, a government prohibited a game, or a classification board refused to rate it. Those actions are not the same—and the records available here establish fewer than ten confirmed cases. This guide separates documented government or court actions from controversy, complaints and market withdrawals, rather than filling a ten-game list with claims the evidence cannot support.
What counts as a video game ban?
A prohibition order or court-ordered confiscation is a formal state action. A refusal to classify can prevent lawful sale where a rating is required, but may be overturned or followed by a modified version receiving a certificate. A government-ordered block on dissemination is another distinct measure. By contrast, a game’s withdrawal after negative publicity, a police complaint, or an age rating does not by itself establish a ban.
The cases below are historical accounts in a 2008 European Commission report and a 2007–2008 Norwegian government report. They do not establish each game’s current legal status or retail availability.
Confirmed government or court actions
Manhunt — Germany, 2004
- Action: Munich County Court ordered all versions confiscated.
- Reason reported: The European Commission said the court relied on a penal provision against depicting and glorifying violence.
- Afterward: The report does not provide a later legal outcome for Germany.
European Commission report (2008).
Manhunt — United States, United Kingdom and Ireland
- Action: A Norwegian government report retrospectively describes the game as temporarily banned in these countries and withdrawn from the market.
- Reason: The cited passage does not give a country-by-country legal rationale or chronology.
- Afterward: The report says a milder version was later produced. It does not establish the details of that version’s release in each country.
This is a broad retrospective account, not a complete legal history for each jurisdiction. Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Equality report (2007–2008), chapter 8.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware match#1 Best Overall
- Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.
Manhunt 2 — Ireland, United Kingdom and Italy, 2007–2008
The European Commission report records different actions in each country; describing all three simply as the same kind of ban would obscure what happened.
- Ireland: In June 2007, authorities issued a prohibition order. The cited account does not detail a later outcome.
- United Kingdom: The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) rejected the original game in June 2007. Following an appeal and judicial review process, a modified version received an 18 certificate in 2008.
- Italy: In June 2007, the Minister of Communications blocked dissemination of the game.
European Commission report (2008).
Dead Rising — Germany, 2007
- Action: The game was placed on the Index and confiscated by a Hamburg County Court decision in June 2007.
- Reason: The cited report excerpt does not state the court’s reasoning.
- Afterward: The report does not give a later legal outcome.
European Commission report (2008).
Carmageddon — United Kingdom, 1997
- Action: The European Commission report describes the original as the first video game refused BBFC classification.
- Afterward: A modified version later received a classification certificate. The refusal therefore did not mean every version remained prohibited.
European Commission report (2008).
Controversies that were not confirmed bans
Rule of Rose — Europe, 2006
The Norwegian government report describes public and political controversy around the game and says it was later withdrawn due to negative publicity. The cited passage does not establish a formal prohibition or other legal ban. Withdrawal after controversy is not proof that a government or court banned a game.
Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Equality report (2007–2008), chapter 8.
Grand Theft Auto — Norway, 2003
The Commissioner for Children and the Norwegian Consumer Council reported the game to police under a penal-code provision concerning improper use of gross violence for entertainment. Police ultimately dropped the case. A complaint and investigation are not a prohibition; the cited account does not describe this as a ban.
Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Equality report (2007–2008), chapter 8.
Why an age rating is not a ban
Ratings identify intended audiences or content categories; they are not, by themselves, prohibitions. In the UK, the government announced in 2012 that the Video Standards Council would classify games under PEGI and that PEGI 12, 16 and 18 ratings would receive legal backing under new rules. That announcement describes the rules introduced at that time, not a statement of the UK’s present regulatory arrangements. UK government announcement, 27 July 2012.
Rank #4
- YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT: Should football be state funded? Should soldiers vote on whether to go to war? Should robots be given legal rights? In this game, you are the President, you decide.
- A NEW SOCIAL BOARD GAME that'll have you debating hot topics with your friends and family
- TACKLE ETHICAL DILEMMAS: will you stick to your principles or sell your soul for power? Wrestle with political dilemmas of the past, present and future and navigate the election without damaging your image. As you get closer to the top spot, you'll find out how well you really know your friends and discover what you'll do for power.
- CONTENTS INCLUDE gameboard measuring 490x490mm (19.25x19.25 ins) when laid out, 60-page rule booklet, 156 cards, 6 wodden pawns, 6 wooden player tokens and a wooden dice
- SCREEN FREE FUN: for 3-6 players, ages 14+. The game play is easy to understand, and there is a game play video available via a QR Code on the back of the box
In the United States, the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) says 65% of ratings assigned to physical and console-downloadable games in 2024 were E or E10+. It also reports that, according to Hart Research Associates in 2025, 83% of parents with children who play video games were aware of ESRB ratings and 77% regularly checked them before buying a game. These figures describe ratings and parental awareness, not bans or censorship frequency. ESRB FAQs.
The ESRB’s history page quotes its president, Patricia Vance, attributing this statement to the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia: “This [ESRB rating] system does much to ensure that minors cannot purchase seriously violent games on their own, and that parents who care about the matter can readily evaluate the games their children bring home.” This is a quotation relayed by the ESRB, not a ban decision. ESRB history.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Best Value
- TOP 100 VIDEO GAMES SCRATCH OFF POSTER: Celebrate your love for gaming with our scratch-off poster showcasing 100 iconic video games. Kids and adults alike will enjoy this interactive bucket list
- BUCKET LIST SCRATCH OFF: Scratch off each game as you complete it! Featuring vibrant designs that pay homage to each game, our scratch-off cards add excitement to your video game journey.
- TIMELESS DESIGN: Crafted with a clean, minimalistic design, this poster avoids visual clutter while showcasing 100 legendary games. A perfect decorative piece for any gamer's space.
- UNIQUE SCRATCH OFF POSTER FOR BUCKET LIST ENTHUSIASTS: Ideal for gaming fans and collectors, this modern, well-illustrated scratch-off poster provides an engaging way to track your gaming milestones.
- VIDEO GAME ADVENTURE SEEKERS: Dive into an epic journey with our bucket list poster featuring 100 iconic games. Designed for adventure seekers, it’s a great gift and collectible for gamers everywhere.
Why the same game can face different outcomes
These cases involve different decision-makers and legal mechanisms: courts ordered confiscation in Germany; an Irish prohibition order and an Italian dissemination block targeted Manhunt 2; and the BBFC’s initial refusal of Manhunt 2 in the UK was followed by a certificate for a modified version. The Norwegian report also observed, in its discussion of PEGI policy, “The industry preferred self-regulation at the European level to national regulation by law.” That historical statement helps explain the debate over regulation, but it does not make classification systems equivalent to national bans.
To assess a claim that a game was “banned,” check the jurisdiction, year, authority, exact action and outcome for the specific version. A formal order, a classification refusal, a temporary dissemination block, a rating, a complaint and a commercial withdrawal are materially different events.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
