Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
No—not of the entire PS5 disc backlash. Cyabra’s September 3, 2026 analysis estimated that inauthentic accounts produced 25% of the boycott narrative overall. Its “up to 43%” figure applies only to comments on selected posts from official PlayStation accounts. That distinction matters: the study found a substantial coordinated-amplification layer, but it also found extensive authentic opposition to Sony’s physical-media policies.
What percentage of the PS5 disc backlash was classified as inauthentic?
Cyabra estimated that 25% of the boycott narrative came from accounts it classified as inauthentic. The boycott narrative represented 57.3% of the total conversation it measured, within a discussion that generated an estimated 100.4 million views. Overall, 70.4% of the conversation displayed negative sentiment.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The larger 43% number is narrower. Cyabra said that as much as 43% of comments on relevant posts from official PlayStation handles were inauthentic. It is a reply-section measure for selected official-account posts, not a claim that 43% of every post, account or conversation about PS5 discs was fake.
| Measure | Cyabra’s reported figure | What it describes |
|---|---|---|
| Total estimated views | 100.4 million | The conversation analyzed in 2026 |
| Negative sentiment | 70.4% | Share of the measured conversation displaying negative sentiment |
| Boycott narrative | 57.3% | Share of total conversation volume attributed to the boycott narrative |
| Inauthentic share of boycott narrative | 25% | Cyabra’s estimate for the overall boycott narrative |
| Inauthentic comments on relevant official-account posts | Up to 43% | A targeted reply-section measure |
That denominator issue is why the headline “Almost Half of PS5 Disc Backlash Came from Fake Accounts,” published by Push Square on October 14, 2026, is broader than the study’s central overall estimate. Push Square’s article narrowed the claim in its body to replies on official PlayStation channels, but the headline can be read as describing the entire backlash.
How many accounts and engagements did Cyabra attribute to inauthentic activity?
Cyabra identified 842 inauthentic accounts that generated 113,444 engagements and 1,031,105 potential views. Those figures indicate an amplification network, but potential views are an exposure estimate rather than a count of unique people who saw or believed a post. Engagement totals likewise do not establish that every interaction represented an independent person.
The company’s report used “inauthentic,” not simply “bot.” Cyabra says its system can classify automated accounts, sock puppets, impersonators and other coordinated behavior. An inauthentic classification therefore does not prove that an account was fully automated or that a specific person had no genuine interest in physical games.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsWere the #NoDiskNoBuy posts bots?
Cyabra found a sharp difference between the campaign’s own hashtag and two near-duplicate variants:
| Hashtag | Cyabra’s estimated inauthenticity | Context |
|---|---|---|
| #PhysicalForever | 8.2% | The campaign’s own hashtag, close to the dataset average |
| #NoDiskNoBuy | 86–89% | A near-duplicate variant Cyabra said did not originate from the campaign |
| #ForeverPhysical | 86–89% | A near-duplicate variant Cyabra said did not originate from the campaign |
Those estimates do not mean every post using either variant was automated, nor do they prove who created the variants. They show that Cyabra’s classified inauthentic activity was concentrated much more heavily around the two variants than around #PhysicalForever.
Was the physical-media boycott mostly fake?
No. Cyabra’s own findings point to real, organized anger alongside manipulation. The report says game-preservation advocates were active before Sony’s announcement, that DoesItPlay called for a one-week #PSBlackout on July 26, and that the boycott was announced four weeks before it took effect.
Authentic activity was also capable of spreading widely. Cyabra said 54.9% of authentic engagement was concentrated in 50 posts from 42 accounts. The most influential authentic post came from an account with only 137 followers and generated more than 104,000 engagements. In addition, 28% of key posts came from accounts with fewer than 5,000 followers. Those figures support the report’s description of organic distribution “from the ground up,” rather than a campaign dependent only on large influencers.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The practical conclusion is mixed: some accounts amplified the dispute inauthentically, while a significant portion of the criticism came from identifiable, relatively small accounts and established preservation advocates.
What does “inauthentic” mean in this study?
Cyabra says its authenticity system uses semi-supervised machine learning and hundreds of behavioral parameters. It returns a binary authentic-or-fake result together with a confidence score. The company’s SEC filing says its models are evaluated against labeled “golden datasets” using recall, precision and F1 metrics.
However, the account-level thresholds, training details and classifications in this case are proprietary. Independent observers cannot reproduce the analysis from the public material alone. KonNetwork highlighted that limitation while also pointing out the denominator problem in the 43% figure. Cyabra’s percentages should therefore be read as the company’s estimates, not as an independently audited census of every account discussing PS5 discs.
Did Sony commission the analysis?
There is no public confirmation in the cited material that Sony commissioned or validated this specific analysis. Cyabra’s August 28, 2026 investor release announced a six-figure annual contract with an unnamed leading interactive-entertainment company, but it did not identify Sony. The existence of that contract is not evidence that Sony was the client for this study.
Recommended Free Tools
Cyabra co-founder and CEO Dan Brahmy said, “Online communities move quickly, especially in an industry like interactive entertainment, and coordinated manipulation can distort how organizations understand what their audiences actually think.” That statement explains the commercial relevance of the analysis, but it does not independently verify the figures.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How should the headline be stated accurately?
A precise summary is: Cyabra estimated that inauthentic accounts supplied 25% of the PS5 disc boycott narrative overall, while up to 43% of comments on selected official PlayStation posts were classified as inauthentic. Calling the entire backlash “almost half fake” collapses two different populations and overstates what the report measured.
Readers evaluating similar claims should check four things:
- The denominator: all conversation, the boycott subset or replies to selected official posts.
- The label: “inauthentic” can include coordinated human-operated accounts as well as automation.
- The source: Cyabra produced the analysis, and its classifier is proprietary.
- The counterevidence: authentic accounts, small creators and pre-existing campaign organizations also drove substantial engagement.
What does this mean for the PS5 physical-game dispute?
The study does not establish that Sony stopped making all physical PlayStation games, nor does it resolve Sony’s broader manufacturing or distribution plans. It addresses online conversation around a boycott and the account behavior observed in that dataset. The evidence supports a narrower conclusion: coordinated inauthentic activity helped amplify opposition, especially in replies to official handles and around two near-duplicate hashtags, but it did not make the entire physical-media movement artificial.
Frequently Asked Questions
How reliable are social-media authenticity studies like this one?
They can reveal behavioral patterns at scale, but reliability depends on the classifier, training data and thresholds. Because Cyabra’s case-specific model details are proprietary, its percentages are best treated as attributed estimates rather than independently reproducible measurements.
Why can a small account generate more than 100,000 engagements?
Follower count is not a ceiling on distribution. Reposts, recommendations, replies and platform ranking can expose a post far beyond its original audience, which is how Cyabra’s 137-follower example exceeded 104,000 engagements.
What is the difference between a potential view and an actual view?
A potential-view figure estimates how many impressions an account network could have produced based on audience and distribution. It does not demonstrate that that many people saw the content, watched it, or were unique users.
When did the PS5 physical-media boycott begin?
The cited account says DoesItPlay called for a one-week #PSBlackout on July 26 and that the boycott was announced four weeks before it took effect. The study presents the movement as predating Sony’s announcement rather than appearing spontaneously afterward.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
