PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteA federal judge dismissed Billy Mitchell’s right-of-publicity lawsuit against Cartoon Network in November 2015, ruling that the Regular Show character Garrett Bobby Ferguson (GBF) transformed Mitchell’s recognizable traits into a sufficiently exaggerated fictional character. The First Amendment protected the depiction, the court held; the defendants’ alternative request to transfer the case was denied as moot.
What was Billy Mitchell’s lawsuit about?
Mitchell filed his complaint on July 21, 2015, against Cartoon Network, Cartoon Network Studios and Turner Broadcasting System. He alleged that they used his likeness without permission in GBF, a villain in The Regular Show, to help increase sales and profits. His claim focused on the character’s resemblance to his appearance and gaming persona, including long black hair, a black beard and an association with high scores.
The defendants acknowledged that GBF was an obvious parody of Mitchell’s appearance in the documentary The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters. They argued that the First Amendment protected the character and barred Mitchell’s right-of-publicity claim. The court’s opinion describes the dispute and its resolution in Mitchell v. The Cartoon Network, Inc..
How did the court compare Mitchell with GBF?
The judge applied the transformative-use test, which asks whether a work merely copies a person’s likeness or adds new expression, meaning or message. The court determined that the relevant Regular Show episodes and The King of Kong were sufficient to decide the question at the motion-to-dismiss stage.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
| Comparison | Mitchell’s portrayal | GBF in The Regular Show |
|---|---|---|
| Form | A real person with long dark hair and a beard, as portrayed in The King of Kong. | A giant floating head from outer space with long black hair and a black beard, but no body. |
| Gaming record | Associated with a real Donkey Kong record. | Claims a universe record in the fictional arcade game Broken Bonez. |
| Story and conduct | The documentary portrays Mitchell trying to retain a gaming record and questioning an opponent’s evidence. | In “High Score,” GBF begs the protagonists to let him keep his record, lies about his backstory and explodes into goo after losing. |
The court recognized the visual and thematic similarities, but found GBF was not a literal depiction of Mitchell. His nonhuman form, fictional game and record, and exaggerated behavior changed the character into a parody and caricature rather than a substitute for a conventional depiction of Mitchell.
Why did the judge dismiss the claim?
Judge Anne E. Thompson concluded that the defendants added new expression to the traits they borrowed. The opinion states: “Because they have added something new, Defendants’ appropriation of Plaintiff’s identity passes the Transformative Use Test, and thus receives the protection of the First Amendment.” The court therefore granted the motion to dismiss Mitchell’s right-of-publicity claim.
Rank #2
- Factory sealed DVD
The ruling addressed that claim only. The opinion notes that Mitchell did not bring false-light or defamation claims in this action; it did not decide separate disputes about his records or determine whether his real-world scores were legitimate.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.When was the case dismissed?
- July 21, 2015: Mitchell filed the complaint, according to the opinion.
- November 20, 2015: Date on Judge Thompson’s opinion.
- November 23, 2015: Date of the case note published by Loeb & Loeb.
- November 24, 2015: Reports on the dismissal appeared at GamesBeat and TheWrap.
The court also denied the defendants’ alternative motion to transfer venue as moot. This was a judge’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, not a jury verdict.
Quick Recap
Rank #3
- Officially Licensed: This is an officially licensed CAPCOM title, ensuring an authentic gaming experience. Two Titles in One, Includes Super Street Fighter II: The New Challengers & Street Fighter II: Special Champion Edition
- 🕹️ High Resolution: This collectible game features a high-resolution 2.75-inch full-color display, allowing you to immerse yourself in the classic gameplay. Built-in speaker with volume control
- 🎵 Headphone Jack: 3.5mm headphone jack lets you enjoy Super Street Fighter II on the go on your own privately.
- Iconic Fighting Game: Super Street Fighter II The New Challengers is the ultimate fighting game experience with iconic characters. New Content: Featuring four new characters, four new stages, and enhanced gameplay with new moves and combos
- Portable Gameplay: Powered by 4 AA (non-rechargeable) batteries (not included) or by a USB-C cable (not included)
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
